Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4965 14
Original file (NR4965 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
MOCPARTMENT OF THE RIA LY
F

omit FRE Bini t

BUARD FOR CORRECIION OU

gna eon Tsier MOAT Guile anne
PUL ede HEN EP BN La, ru

ARLINGTON, VA 22204 ©

JET
Docket No. NR4965-14
4 Dec 14
From: Chairman, Board for Carrention of Naval Records
TO: Secretary of the Navy
: Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

   
 
 

 

Ref: {a} Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

“Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/fattachments
(2) CNRC itr 1133 Ser N32 of 4 Nov 14
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record
be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1.

2. The Board, consisting of
FG reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
4 December 2014 and, pursuant to’ its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
‘the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
“applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as

follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
“application has commented to the effect that the request has merit
and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of recerd, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
Docket No. NR4965-14

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. Petitioner was enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1,
effective 11 dune 2013 (Active Duty Service Date). Petitioner met»
the advanced paygrade criteria based on receiving his Associate o
Science degree prior to entering the Navy.

“NOTE 1: The change in the effective date ‘of advancement to E-
- 3 may also impact on Petitioner’s E-4 advancement opportunity. If
Petitioner was eligible for, but did not take an E-4 examination in
September 2013, March 2014, and September 2014 because the above
changé had not yet been made, the following procedures will apply
to remediate that missed opportunity. Petitioner should take the
next available E-4 advancement examination. Once Petitioner
receives his next profile sheet he may reapply to this Board for
consideration of ‘advancement to E-4 retroactive to the date
Petitioner would have been advanced on the “missed” examination
cycle.’ Petitioner should then submit a copy of the worksheets for
the September 2013, March 2014, and September 2014 missed cycles.
In addition, Petitioner should submit a DD Form 149, command
endorsement/recommendation, and must include a copy of this letter
. with the request. The Board will then determine whether the
request will be approved.

‘Note 2: ° The change may also affect Petitioner's eligibility
to take. the E-5 advancement examination as well. If Petitioner
advances to E-4 and was eligible to take the E-5 exam at an earlier
date, he may submit a DD Form 149 to correct both E-4 and E-5
exams. However, before he does so, please ensure that he has taken
both E-4 and E-5 examinations and provides profile sheets for the
examinations taken.

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review
and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

 

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and
having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby

2
Docket No. NR4965-14

announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6432 14

    Original file (NR6432 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. If petitioner was eligible for, but did not take the E-4 examination in September 2013, March 2014 and September 2014 because the above change had not yet been made, the following procedures will apply to remediate that missed opportunity. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0099 14

    Original file (NR0099 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1l. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman; Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 June 2014 and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0005 14

    Original file (NR0005 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0540-13

    Original file (NR0540-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Purguant.to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to that he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 September 2013 and, pursuant to its requlations, determined that the corrective action indicated below ghould be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03122 12

    Original file (03122 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. 3122-12 14 Nov 12 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOs Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01378 12

    Original file (01378 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 October 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0500 14

    Original file (NR0500 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to E-4/1T3 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. If the score received mects or exceeds the score that was previously required for advancement, Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been advanced on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06705-11

    Original file (06705-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval vecora be corrected to show a backdated advancement to E-4/IT3 from either the March 2010 or September 2010 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 September 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2930 14

    Original file (NR2930 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (&) Subject, filed enclosure (1) with nereinafter referred to as Petitioner, this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to ites regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3376 14

    Original file (NR3376 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/085 of 13 Mar 2014 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/AT3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...